Monday, February 29, 2016
UPANIṢAD THEORY
The word 'Upaniṣad' consists of three words – 'Upa' which means 'near', 'ni' which means 'down' and 'shad' which means 'be seated'. So Upaniṣad means „be seated at the feet of the guru to receive the teaching.“ During ancient times, pupils used to sit near the teacher in a circle to learn the holy teachings and sacred scriptures. The Upaniṣad philosophy basically indicates learning from a spiritual teacher. The exact number of classical Upaniṣads is not known. Scholars differ when it comes to estimating the number of Upaniṣads that exist. It is estimated that there are around 350 Upaniṣads that exist today. The Upaniṣads constitute the Vedanta (Veda-
UPANIṢAD PERIOD
Upaniṣad was known as the philosophy of Vedanta. There is large number of Upaniṣad (sitting close to the teacher). Upaniṣads are known as secret teaching, Guhyam parama Guhyam rahasyam. Upaniṣadic thinkers strove to understand the nature of the person, the nature of world / universe, and the relationship between those too. There are the aims of Upaniṣad “
ĀRANYAKA PERIOD
Āranyaka period was new era of thinking that the Āryan society of understand the nature and life through wisdom purity. In the Brahmin period Āryans expected a better future through yāgas based on faith and devotion. Preference to the spiritual development is given in the Āranyaka period as a result of this; the demand for yāga become loses. The spiritual development was open for all without any discrimination all low castes including women are permitted to practice spiritual development. This count is done without wasting money and other assets. Āranyaka period can be considered as a new era in the Vedic thought because the significance of the spiritual development was established
during this period. Wisdom became very important than the faith and devotion. Yoga practices were introduced during the Āranyaka period. Many people went to the forest to meditate when they need mental (sati) function; scholars are not unanimous about the origin of the Āranyaka period. According to Vedic period tradition Aranyaka period is an extent of Sañyāsi Āśrama (stage) four Āśramas; 1) Brahma Cariya, 2) Ashastas, 3) Vanapratha, and 4) Sañyasi. During the Sañyasi period, Brāhmaṇa who was come to the old age goes to the forest to meditate. In the four stages of meditation started only in the Sañyasi period. Therefore some argue that the Āranyaka period could be considered as a development of the Sañyasi stage. There is
during this period. Wisdom became very important than the faith and devotion. Yoga practices were introduced during the Āranyaka period. Many people went to the forest to meditate when they need mental (sati) function; scholars are not unanimous about the origin of the Āranyaka period. According to Vedic period tradition Aranyaka period is an extent of Sañyāsi Āśrama (stage) four Āśramas; 1) Brahma Cariya, 2) Ashastas, 3) Vanapratha, and 4) Sañyasi. During the Sañyasi period, Brāhmaṇa who was come to the old age goes to the forest to meditate. In the four stages of meditation started only in the Sañyasi period. Therefore some argue that the Āranyaka period could be considered as a development of the Sañyasi stage. There is
THE THEORY OF KAMMA
The teaching of kamma is found almost in all religious schools in India during the time of the Buddha. Some schools believed that everything ahppens due to former kamma, everything happens due to the will of God. And some believed as everything happens without cause, they are mere accidents and coincidence s. The Buddha rejected all these erroneous views and defines kamma as simply action or a deed. The definition of kamma in Nibedhikapariyāya Sutta says that cetanā or volition is kamma (cetanāhaṃ bhikkhave kammaṃ vadāmi), which is
CONCEPT OF KAMMA
Kamma literally means 'action' or 'deed'. In the religious technical sense it means moral action which brings about good or bad results.
All religions in India teach about kamma. Vedic Brahmanism teaches all action to please the God on good kamma and those aagainst the wish of the God on bad kamma. Thus sacrifice is called kamma, a good action to please the god. Upaniṣadic taechers give a more moral meaning. Some șramaṇa teachers – especially the materialists – did not believe in kamma. The Jainas believed that one's past kamma is the
All religions in India teach about kamma. Vedic Brahmanism teaches all action to please the God on good kamma and those aagainst the wish of the God on bad kamma. Thus sacrifice is called kamma, a good action to please the god. Upaniṣadic taechers give a more moral meaning. Some șramaṇa teachers – especially the materialists – did not believe in kamma. The Jainas believed that one's past kamma is the
ORIGIN OF BUDDHISM
When Buddhism arose there were two main religious traditions: Brāhmaṇa and Śramaṇa. The terms samaṇa-brāhmaṇa in the suttas refer to these two traditions. The Brāhmaṇic tradition were of two levels: (a) Vedic (b) Upaniṣadic Vedic-Brāhmaṇic tradition depended mainly on sacrifice Yajña also called karma. It was believed in sacrifice as in the most effective mean of security of happiness here and here-after. Therefore it was called Yajña-mārga or karma-mārga. In this tradition there was the belief in a creator God and a pantheon of other gods. The worship of them, offerings to them were the main religious practice. The Upaniṣadic tradition is more philosophical. It believed in a universal
principal called Brāhmaṇ (viṣva-ātman) which should have been the source of everything. Its counterpart was ātman (pudgda(?)ātman). Both those were metaphysical concepts. The way to salvation was the realization of the ultimate oneness of the Brāhmaṇ – ātman. This had to be attained through knowledge (jñāna) produced by the practice of mental concentration and observance of severe ascetic practices (aṭṭhakilamathānuyogo). The Śramaṇa tradition opposed these beliefs. There were six famous Śramaṇa teachers: 1. Ajita (a materialist who did not believe in morality) 2. Makkhalī (inclined to materialism; completely denied personal effort and action (kiriyavāda and viriyavāda) ) 3. Pakudha (inclined to materialism) 4. Pūrana (inclined to materialism) 5. Sañjaya (a sceptic) 6. Mahāvīraan (an extremist who preached non-violence and kamma determinism) Ajita was a materialist who did not believe in morality.
principal called Brāhmaṇ (viṣva-ātman) which should have been the source of everything. Its counterpart was ātman (pudgda(?)ātman). Both those were metaphysical concepts. The way to salvation was the realization of the ultimate oneness of the Brāhmaṇ – ātman. This had to be attained through knowledge (jñāna) produced by the practice of mental concentration and observance of severe ascetic practices (aṭṭhakilamathānuyogo). The Śramaṇa tradition opposed these beliefs. There were six famous Śramaṇa teachers: 1. Ajita (a materialist who did not believe in morality) 2. Makkhalī (inclined to materialism; completely denied personal effort and action (kiriyavāda and viriyavāda) ) 3. Pakudha (inclined to materialism) 4. Pūrana (inclined to materialism) 5. Sañjaya (a sceptic) 6. Mahāvīraan (an extremist who preached non-violence and kamma determinism) Ajita was a materialist who did not believe in morality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)